HPV vaccination in Africa in the COVID-19 era: a cross-sectional survey of healthcare providers' knowledge, training, and recommendation practices.

Introduction: Although the burden of cervical cancer in Africa is highest, HPV vaccination coverage remains alarmingly low in this region. Providers' knowledge and recommendation are key drivers of HPV vaccination uptake. Yet, evidence about providers' knowledge and recommendation practices about the HPV vaccine against a backdrop of emerging vaccine hesitancy fueled by the COVID-19 pandemic is lacking in Africa. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2021-2022 among healthcare providers involved in cervical cancer prevention activities in Africa. They were invited to report prior training, the availability of the HPV vaccine in their practice, whether they recommended the HPV vaccine, and, if not, the reasons for not recommending it. Their knowledge about the HPV vaccine was assessed through self-reporting (perceived knowledge) and with three pre-tested knowledge questions (measured knowledge). Results: Of the 153 providers from 23 African countries who responded to the survey (mean age: 38.5 years, SD: 10.1), 75 (54.0%) were female and 97 (63.4%) were based In countries with national HPV immunization programs. Overall, 57 (43.8%) reported having received prior training on HPV vaccine education/counseling, and 40 (37.4%) indicated that the HPV vaccine was available at the facility where they work. Most respondents (109, 83.2%) reported recommending the HPV vaccine in their practice. Vaccine unavailability (57.1%), lack of effective communication tools and informational material (28.6%), and need for adequate training (28.6%) were the most commonly reported reasons for not recommending the HPV vaccine. While 63 providers (52.9%) reported that their knowledge about HPV vaccination was adequate for their practice, only 9.9% responded correctly to the 3 knowledge questions. Conclusion: To increase HPV vaccination coverage and counter misinformation about this vaccine in Africa, adequate training of providers and culturally appropriate educational materials are needed to improve their knowledge of the HPV vaccine and to facilitate effective communication with their patients and the community.

Developing and sustaining high-quality care for children with cancer: the WHO Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer / Desarrollo y mantenimiento de una atención de alta calidad para pacientes pediátricos con cáncer: la Iniciativa Mundial de la OMS contra el Cáncer Infantil / Desenvolvimento e manutenção de atenção de alta qualidade para crianças com câncer: a Iniciativa Global para o Câncer Infantil da OMS

[ABSTRACT]. Cancer is a major public health concern, impacting nearly 20 million people each year, and it is responsible for 1 in 6 deaths worldwide. The burden of cancer is increasing rapidly, straining health systems that are unable to prevent and manage the disease. Childhood cancer constitutes a significant and relevant public health challenge; it was the ninth leading cause of childhood disease globally, according to findings by the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study. Almost 80% of all children diagnosed with cancer live in low- and middle-income countries where treatment is often unavailable or unaffordable. As a result, only about 15–45% of these children survive compared with more than 80% in high-income countries. This represents a great health inequity. Delivering on the mandate provided by World Health Assembly resolution 70.12, WHO together with St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and other global partners launched the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer at the United Nations General Assembly during the third High-level Meeting on the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in September 2018. The Initiative aims to increase global survival for children with cancer to at least 60% by 2030, while reducing suffering for all children with cancer. Five years after launching the Initiative, more than 70 countries across the World Health Organization’s 6 regions have advanced to different phases of action through implementation of the Initiative’s CureAll framework for action. Many successful approaches to implementing the CureAll pillars and enablers have demonstrated that improving care for children with cancer in low- and middle-income countries is possible as long as there is strong political will, multisectoral commitments and strategic investment.

[RESUMEN]. El cáncer es un importante problema de salud pública: afecta a cerca de 20 millones de personas cada año y es responsable de 1 de cada 6 muertes a nivel mundial. La carga del cáncer está aumentando rápidamente, lo que somete a una gran presión a los sistemas de salud que no pueden prevenir y manejar la enfermedad. El cáncer infantil constituye un importante problema de salud pública y tiene gran relevancia: fue la novena causa de enfermedad infantil a nivel mundial, según los hallazgos del estudio sobre la carga mundial de enfermedad correspondiente al 2017. Casi el 80% de todos los casos de cáncer infantil se registran en países de ingresos bajos o medianos, donde el tratamiento a menudo resulta inasequible o no está disponible. Por este motivo, solo sobreviven entre el 15% y el 45% de estos pacientes pediátricos, frente a más del 80% en los países de ingresos altos. Esto constituye una gran inequidad en materia de salud. En cumplimiento del mandato establecido en la resolución WHA70.12 de la Asamblea Mundial de la Salud, la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) —junto con el hospital pediátrico de investigación St. Jude y otros asociados mundiales— puso en marcha la Iniciativa Mundial contra el Cáncer Infantil ante la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas, en ocasión de la tercera reunión de alto nivel sobre la prevención y el control de las enfermedades no transmisibles, celebrada en septiembre del 2018. Esta iniciativa tiene como objetivo incrementar la tasa de supervivencia mundial de los pacientes pediátricos con cáncer hasta por lo menos el 60% para el 2030 y, simultáneamente, reducir el sufrimiento de toda la población infantil con cáncer. Transcurridos cinco años de la puesta en marcha de la iniciativa, más de 70 países de las seis regiones de la OMS han logrado avanzar a distintas fases de actuación mediante la aplicación del marco de acción de la iniciativa denominado CureAll. Ha habido muchos enfoques que han dado buenos resultados para la consecución de los pilares y los elementos facilitadores de CureAll y que han demostrado que es posible mejorar la atención de la población infantil con cáncer en los países de ingresos bajos y medianos, siempre que haya una férrea voluntad política, compromisos multisectoriales e inversiones estratégicas.

[RESUMO]. O câncer é um importante problema de saúde pública que afeta cerca de 20 milhões de pessoas a cada ano e é responsável por uma em cada seis mortes em todo o mundo. A carga do câncer está aumentando rapidamente, sobrecarregando os sistemas de saúde, que não conseguem prevenir e controlar a doença. O câncer infantil constitui um desafio significativo e relevante para a saúde pública: essa foi a nona principal causa de doenças infantis em todo o mundo, de acordo com os resultados do estudo Global Burden of Disease 2017. Quase 80% de todas as crianças diagnosticadas com câncer vivem em países de baixa e média renda, onde o tratamento geralmente não está disponível ou é inacessível. Como resultado, apenas cerca de 15% a 45% dessas crianças sobrevivem, em comparação com mais de 80% nos países de alta renda. Isso representa uma grande falta de equidade em saúde. Cumprindo o estabelecido pela Resolução 70.12 da Assembleia Mundial da Saúde, a Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), juntamente com o Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital e outros parceiros mundiais, lançou a Iniciativa Global para o Câncer Infantil na Assembleia Geral das Nações Unidas, durante a terceira Reunião de Alto Nível sobre prevenção e controle de doenças não transmissíveis, em setembro de 2018. A Iniciativa tem como objetivo aumentar a sobrevida global de crianças com câncer para pelo menos 60% até 2030 e, ao mesmo tempo, reduzir o sofrimento de todas as crianças com câncer. Cinco anos após o lançamento da Iniciativa, mais de 70 países das seis regiões da OMS avançaram para diferentes fases de ação por meio da implementação da estrutura CureAll da Iniciativa. O sucesso de muitas abordagens para implementação dos pilares e facilitadores da CureAll demonstraram que é possível melhorar o atendimento a crianças com câncer em países de baixa e média renda, desde que haja forte vontade política, compromissos multissetoriais e investimento estratégico.

Developing and sustaining high-quality care for children with cancer: the WHO Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer.

Cancer is a major public health concern, impacting nearly 20 million people each year, and it is responsible for 1 in 6 deaths worldwide. The burden of cancer is increasing rapidly, straining health systems that are unable to prevent and manage the disease. Childhood cancer constitutes a significant and relevant public health challenge; it was the ninth leading cause of childhood disease globally, according to findings by the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study. Almost 80% of all children diagnosed with cancer live in low- and middle-income countries where treatment is often unavailable or unaffordable. As a result, only about 15-45% of these children survive compared with more than 80% in high-income countries. This represents a great health inequity. Delivering on the mandate provided by World Health Assembly resolution 70.12, WHO together with St. Jude Children's Research Hospital and other global partners launched the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer at the United Nations General Assembly during the third High-level Meeting on the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in September 2018. The Initiative aims to increase global survival for children with cancer to at least 60% by 2030, while reducing suffering for all children with cancer. Five years after launching the Initiative, more than 70 countries across the World Health Organization's 6 regions have advanced to different phases of action through implementation of the Initiative's CureAll framework for action. Many successful approaches to implementing the CureAll pillars and enablers have demonstrated that improving care for children with cancer in low- and middle-income countries is possible as long as there is strong political will, multisectoral commitments and strategic investment.

El cáncer es un importante problema de salud pública: afecta a cerca de 20 millones de personas cada año y es responsable de 1 de cada 6 muertes a nivel mundial. La carga del cáncer está aumentando rápidamente, lo que somete a una gran presión a los sistemas de salud que no pueden prevenir y manejar la enfermedad. El cáncer infantil constituye un importante problema de salud pública y tiene gran relevancia: fue la novena causa de enfermedad infantil a nivel mundial, según los hallazgos del estudio sobre la carga mundial de enfermedad correspondiente al 2017. Casi el 80% de todos los casos de cáncer infantil se registran en países de ingresos bajos o medianos, donde el tratamiento a menudo resulta inasequible o no está disponible. Por este motivo, solo sobreviven entre el 15% y el 45% de estos pacientes pediátricos, frente a más del 80% en los países de ingresos altos. Esto constituye una gran inequidad en materia de salud.En cumplimiento del mandato establecido en la resolución WHA70.12 de la Asamblea Mundial de la Salud, la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) ­junto con el hospital pediátrico de investigación St. Jude y otros asociados mundiales­ puso en marcha la Iniciativa Mundial contra el Cáncer Infantil ante la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas, en ocasión de la tercera reunión de alto nivel sobre la prevención y el control de las enfermedades no transmisibles, celebrada en septiembre del 2018. Esta iniciativa tiene como objetivo incrementar la tasa de supervivencia mundial de los pacientes pediátricos con cáncer hasta por lo menos el 60% para el 2030 y, simultáneamente, reducir el sufrimiento de toda la población infantil con cáncer. Transcurridos cinco años de la puesta en marcha de la iniciativa, más de 70 países de las seis regiones de la OMS han logrado avanzar a distintas fases de actuación mediante la aplicación del marco de acción de la iniciativa denominado CureAll. Ha habido muchos enfoques que han dado buenos resultados para la consecución de los pilares y los elementos facilitadores de CureAll y que han demostrado que es posible mejorar la atención de la población infantil con cáncer en los países de ingresos bajos y medianos, siempre que haya una férrea voluntad política, compromisos multisectoriales e inversiones estratégicas.

O câncer é um importante problema de saúde pública que afeta cerca de 20 milhões de pessoas a cada ano e é responsável por uma em cada seis mortes em todo o mundo. A carga do câncer está aumentando rapidamente, sobrecarregando os sistemas de saúde, que não conseguem prevenir e controlar a doença. O câncer infantil constitui um desafio significativo e relevante para a saúde pública: essa foi a nona principal causa de doenças infantis em todo o mundo, de acordo com os resultados do estudo Global Burden of Disease 2017. Quase 80% de todas as crianças diagnosticadas com câncer vivem em países de baixa e média renda, onde o tratamento geralmente não está disponível ou é inacessível. Como resultado, apenas cerca de 15% a 45% dessas crianças sobrevivem, em comparação com mais de 80% nos países de alta renda. Isso representa uma grande falta de equidade em saúde.Cumprindo o estabelecido pela Resolução 70.12 da Assembleia Mundial da Saúde, a Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), juntamente com o Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital e outros parceiros mundiais, lançou a Iniciativa Global para o Câncer Infantil na Assembleia Geral das Nações Unidas, durante a terceira Reunião de Alto Nível sobre prevenção e controle de doenças não transmissíveis, em setembro de 2018. A Iniciativa tem como objetivo aumentar a sobrevida global de crianças com câncer para pelo menos 60% até 2030 e, ao mesmo tempo, reduzir o sofrimento de todas as crianças com câncer. Cinco anos após o lançamento da Iniciativa, mais de 70 países das seis regiões da OMS avançaram para diferentes fases de ação por meio da implementação da estrutura CureAll da Iniciativa. O sucesso de muitas abordagens para implementação dos pilares e facilitadores da CureAll demonstraram que é possível melhorar o atendimento a crianças com câncer em países de baixa e média renda, desde que haja forte vontade política, compromissos multissetoriais e investimento estratégico.

Socioeconomic inequalities in cervical precancer screening among women in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe: analysis of Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment surveys.

OBJECTIVES: We examined age, residence, education and wealth inequalities and their combinations on cervical precancer screening probabilities for women. We hypothesised that inequalities in screening favoured women who were older, lived in urban areas, were more educated and wealthier. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment data. SETTING: Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Differences in screening rates were analysed using multivariable logistic regressions, controlling for age, residence, education and wealth. Inequalities in screening probability were estimated using marginal effects models. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 25-49 years, reporting screening. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported screening rates, and their inequalities in percentage points, with differences of 20%+ defined as high inequality, 5%-20% as medium, 0%-5% as low. RESULTS: The sample size of participants ranged from 5882 in Ethiopia to 9186 in Tanzania. The screening rates were low in the surveyed countries, ranging from 3.5% (95% CI 3.1% to 4.0%) in Rwanda to 17.1% (95% CI 15.8% to 18.5%) and 17.4% (95% CI 16.1% to 18.8%) in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Inequalities in screening rates were low based on covariates. Combining the inequalities led to significant inequalities in screening probabilities between women living in rural areas aged 25-34 years, with a primary education level, from the lowest wealth quintile, and women living in urban areas aged 35-49 years, with the highest education level, from the highest wealth quintile, ranging from 4.4% in Rwanda to 44.6% in Zimbabwe. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical precancer screening rates were inequitable and low. No country surveyed achieved one-third of the WHO's target of screening 70% of eligible women by 2030. Combining inequalities led to high inequalities, preventing women who were younger, lived in rural areas, were uneducated, and from the lowest wealth quintile from screening. Governments should include and monitor equity in their cervical precancer screening programmes.

Developing and sustaining high-quality care for children with cancer: the WHO Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer / Desarrollo y mantenimiento de una atención de alta calidad para pacientes pediátricos con cáncer: la Iniciativa Mundial de la OMS contra el Cáncer Infantil / Desenvolvimento e manutenção de atenção de alta qualidade para crianças com câncer: a Iniciativa Global para o Câncer Infantil da OMS

ABSTRACT Cancer is a major public health concern, impacting nearly 20 million people each year, and it is responsible for 1 in 6 deaths worldwide. The burden of cancer is increasing rapidly, straining health systems that are unable to prevent and manage the disease. Childhood cancer constitutes a significant and relevant public health challenge; it was the ninth leading cause of childhood disease globally, according to findings by the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study. Almost 80% of all children diagnosed with cancer live in low- and middle-income countries where treatment is often unavailable or unaffordable. As a result, only about 15-45% of these children survive compared with more than 80% in high-income countries. This represents a great health inequity. Delivering on the mandate provided by World Health Assembly resolution 70.12, WHO together with St. Jude Children's Research Hospital and other global partners launched the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer at the United Nations General Assembly during the third High-level Meeting on the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in September 2018. The Initiative aims to increase global survival for children with cancer to at least 60% by 2030, while reducing suffering for all children with cancer. Five years after launching the Initiative, more than 70 countries across the World Health Organization's 6 regions have advanced to different phases of action through implementation of the Initiative's CureAll framework for action. Many successful approaches to implementing the CureAll pillars and enablers have demonstrated that improving care for children with cancer in low- and middle-income countries is possible as long as there is strong political will, multisectoral commitments and strategic investment.

RESUMEN El cáncer es un importante problema de salud pública: afecta a cerca de 20 millones de personas cada año y es responsable de 1 de cada 6 muertes a nivel mundial. La carga del cáncer está aumentando rápidamente, lo que somete a una gran presión a los sistemas de salud que no pueden prevenir y manejar la enfermedad. El cáncer infantil constituye un importante problema de salud pública y tiene gran relevancia: fue la novena causa de enfermedad infantil a nivel mundial, según los hallazgos del estudio sobre la carga mundial de enfermedad correspondiente al 2017. Casi el 80% de todos los casos de cáncer infantil se registran en países de ingresos bajos o medianos, donde el tratamiento a menudo resulta inasequible o no está disponible. Por este motivo, solo sobreviven entre el 15% y el 45% de estos pacientes pediátricos, frente a más del 80% en los países de ingresos altos. Esto constituye una gran inequidad en materia de salud. En cumplimiento del mandato establecido en la resolución WHA70.12 de la Asamblea Mundial de la Salud, la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) —junto con el hospital pediátrico de investigación St. Jude y otros asociados mundiales— puso en marcha la Iniciativa Mundial contra el Cáncer Infantil ante la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas, en ocasión de la tercera reunión de alto nivel sobre la prevención y el control de las enfermedades no transmisibles, celebrada en septiembre del 2018. Esta iniciativa tiene como objetivo incrementar la tasa de supervivencia mundial de los pacientes pediátricos con cáncer hasta por lo menos el 60% para el 2030 y, simultáneamente, reducir el sufrimiento de toda la población infantil con cáncer. Transcurridos cinco años de la puesta en marcha de la iniciativa, más de 70 países de las seis regiones de la OMS han logrado avanzar a distintas fases de actuación mediante la aplicación del marco de acción de la iniciativa denominado CureAll. Ha habido muchos enfoques que han dado buenos resultados para la consecución de los pilares y los elementos facilitadores de CureAll y que han demostrado que es posible mejorar la atención de la población infantil con cáncer en los países de ingresos bajos y medianos, siempre que haya una férrea voluntad política, compromisos multisectoriales e inversiones estratégicas.

RESUMO O câncer é um importante problema de saúde pública que afeta cerca de 20 milhões de pessoas a cada ano e é responsável por uma em cada seis mortes em todo o mundo. A carga do câncer está aumentando rapidamente, sobrecarregando os sistemas de saúde, que não conseguem prevenir e controlar a doença. O câncer infantil constitui um desafio significativo e relevante para a saúde pública: essa foi a nona principal causa de doenças infantis em todo o mundo, de acordo com os resultados do estudo Global Burden of Disease 2017. Quase 80% de todas as crianças diagnosticadas com câncer vivem em países de baixa e média renda, onde o tratamento geralmente não está disponível ou é inacessível. Como resultado, apenas cerca de 15% a 45% dessas crianças sobrevivem, em comparação com mais de 80% nos países de alta renda. Isso representa uma grande falta de equidade em saúde. Cumprindo o estabelecido pela Resolução 70.12 da Assembleia Mundial da Saúde, a Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), juntamente com o Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital e outros parceiros mundiais, lançou a Iniciativa Global para o Câncer Infantil na Assembleia Geral das Nações Unidas, durante a terceira Reunião de Alto Nível sobre prevenção e controle de doenças não transmissíveis, em setembro de 2018. A Iniciativa tem como objetivo aumentar a sobrevida global de crianças com câncer para pelo menos 60% até 2030 e, ao mesmo tempo, reduzir o sofrimento de todas as crianças com câncer. Cinco anos após o lançamento da Iniciativa, mais de 70 países das seis regiões da OMS avançaram para diferentes fases de ação por meio da implementação da estrutura CureAll da Iniciativa. O sucesso de muitas abordagens para implementação dos pilares e facilitadores da CureAll demonstraram que é possível melhorar o atendimento a crianças com câncer em países de baixa e média renda, desde que haja forte vontade política, compromissos multissetoriais e investimento estratégico.

Targeting elimination of cervical cancer by 2030: a baseline assessment in six African countries-part II.

Background: Africa is home to many countries with the highest incidence of cervical cancer in the world. It is encouraging to see that the efforts to prevent and manage this disease are intensifying across the continent. The World Health Organization (WHO) has, in the last years, led a world-wide initiative to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem, starting by setting clear targets for 2030. Aim: To assist those African countries with the largest burden of cervical cancer, to reach the set targets, as a first step, WHO initiated a baseline capacity assessment in African high burden countries. We present and discuss the results thereof in this paper. Method: The countries selected for the baseline evaluation were Eswatini, Guinea, Malawi, Rwanda, Uganda and Zambia. The data were collected by a mailed questionnaire in English, with 129 questions, most of them with preset answer options. It was answered by national coordinators of non-communicable diseases, cancer control or reproductive health programmes in the ministries of health and by the WHO country representatives. Based on the answers, suggestions were made towards optimising the efforts for cancer control. Results: Except for Eswatini and Guinea, vaccination against the human papilloma virus (HPV) has reached between 74% and 98% of girls in the age bracket. The main method for cervical screening is still inspection with acid acetic. HPV testing, recommended by WHO, is being introduced slowly. The numbers of women screened are not yet nearing the required levels. Between 30% and 70% of the cervical cancers diagnosed are being treated with palliative intent. A deficit of personnel was reported for all professions involved in cervical cancer care. Conclusions: Guinea will need assistance to implement HPV immunisations and expand screening. In all six countries surveyed, steps should be taken to introduce or scale up the more precise HPV screening instead of acid acetic inspection of the cervix, to replace the current cryoablation of the preinvasive lesions of the cervix with thermal ablation and to increase the capacity for screening. Solutions need to be found for covering the dearth in gynaecological oncologists and radiotherapy installations and personnel.

The World Health Organization targets for cervical cancer control by 2030: a baseline assessment in six African countries-part I.

Aim: We present and analyse the findings of a survey of the readiness of the healthcare systems in Eswatini, Guinea, Malawi, Rwanda, Uganda and Zambia, to implement the necessary measures for attaining the targets for cervical cancer control, set by The World Health Organization (WHO), by the year 2030. Methods: A questionnaire with 129 questions with preset answer options was completed in 2020, by ministries of health programme coordinators for non-communicable diseases, cancer control and/or reproductive health, and by WHO country offices, in the six countries selected. Results: The findings on demographics, burden of disease, governance and management, laboratory services, equipment, supplies and medicines, as well as on personnel and training are presented here. The burden of cervical cancer in the countries studied is considerable, according to The International Agency for Research on Cancer estimations. The incidence of the disease is augmented by the high prevalence of HIV infection, in most of the countries surveyed. Most of the population live in rural areas, where access to the health services is far from ideal. Facilities for screening with human papilloma virus tests and for histopathology are limited. One pathologist covers the diagnostic needs of between 0.5 and 4 million inhabitants. Most other categories of health professionals are under-represented, and the capacity to train them is inadequate. Conclusions: Strong country commitment and leadership, innovative solutions and extensive international cooperation would be needed to attain the targets of cervical cancer control set by WHO, in these countries.

Priorities for cancer research in low- and middle-income countries: a global perspective.

Cancer research currently is heavily skewed toward high-income countries (HICs), with little research conducted in, and relevant to, the problems of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This regional discordance in cancer knowledge generation and application needs to be rebalanced. Several gaps in the research enterprise of LMICs need to be addressed to promote regionally relevant research, and radical rethinking is needed to address the burning issues in cancer care in these regions. We identified five top priorities in cancer research in LMICs based on current and projected needs: reducing the burden of patients with advanced disease; improving access and affordability, and outcomes of cancer treatment; value-based care and health economics; quality improvement and implementation research; and leveraging technology to improve cancer control. LMICs have an excellent opportunity to address important questions in cancer research that could impact cancer control globally. Success will require collaboration and commitment from governments, policy makers, funding agencies, health care organizations and leaders, researchers and the public.

Implementation research to accelerate scale-up of national screen and treat strategies towards the elimination of cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is a significant public health problem, with 570,000 new cases and 300,000 deaths of women per year globally, mostly in low- and middle-income countries. In 2018 the WHO Director General made a call to action for the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem. MAIN BODY: New thinking on programmatic approaches to introduce emerging technologies and screening and treatment interventions of cervical precancer at scale is needed to achieve elimination goals. Implementation research (IR) is an important yet underused tool for facilitating scale-up of evidence-based screening and treatment interventions, as most research has focused on developing and evaluating new interventions. It is time for countries to define their specific IR needs to understand acceptability, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of interventions as to design and ensure effective implementation, scale-up, and sustainability of evidence-based screening and treatment interventions. WHO convened an expert advisory group to identify priority IR questions for HPV-based screening and treatment interventions in population-based programmes. Several international organizations are supporting large scale introduction of screen-and-treat approaches in many countries, providing ideal platforms to evaluate different approaches and strategies in diverse national contexts. CONCLUSION: For reducing cervical cancer incidence and mortality, the readiness of health systems, the reach and effectiveness of new technologies and algorithms for increasing screening and treatment coverage, and the factors that support sustainability of these programmes need to be better understood. Answering these key IR questions could provide actionable guidance for countries seeking to implement the WHO Global Strategy towards cervical cancer elimination.

The use of thermal ablation in diverse cervical cancer "screen-and-treat" service platforms in Zambia.

OBJECTIVE: Thermal ablation (TA) was implemented in public sector cervical cancer prevention services in Zambia in 2012. Initially introduced as a treatment modality in primary healthcare clinics, it was later included in mobile outreach campaigns and clinical research trials. We report the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and provider uptake of TA in diverse clinical contexts. METHODS: Screening services based on visual inspection with acetic acid were offered by trained nurses to non-pregnant women aged 25-59 years. Women with a type 1 transformation zone (TZ) were treated with same-visit TA. Those with a type 2 or 3 TZ, or suspicious for cancer, were managed with same-visit electrosurgical excision or punch biopsy, respectively. A provider survey was conducted. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2020, 2123 women were treated with TA: primary healthcare clinics, n = 746; mobile outreach clinics, n = 1127; research clinics, n = 250. Of the 996 women treated in primary healthcare and research clinics, 359 (48%) were HIV positive. Mild cramping during treatment was the most common adverse effect. No treatment interruptions occurred. No major complications were reported in the early (6 weeks) follow-up period. Providers expressed an overwhelming preference for TA over cryotherapy. CONCLUSION: TA was feasible, safe, and acceptable in diverse clinical contexts. It was the preferred ablation method of providers when compared with cryotherapy.

Prioritizing Health-Sector Interventions for Noncommunicable Diseases and Injuries in Low- and Lower-Middle Income Countries: National NCDI Poverty Commissions.

Health sector priorities and interventions to prevent and manage noncommunicable diseases and injuries (NCDIs) in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs) have primarily adopted elements of the World Health Organization Global Action Plan for NCDs 2013-2020. However, there have been limited efforts in LLMICs to prioritize among conditions and health-sector interventions for NCDIs based on local epidemiology and contextually relevant risk factors or that incorporate the equitable distribution of health outcomes. The Lancet Commission on Reframing Noncommunicable Diseases and Injuries for the Poorest Billion supported national NCDI Poverty Commissions to define local NCDI epidemiology, determine an expanded set of priority NCDI conditions, and recommend cost-effective, equitable health-sector interventions. Fifteen national commissions and 1 state-level commission were established from 2016-2019. Six commissions completed the prioritization exercise and selected an average of 25 NCDI conditions; 15 conditions were selected by all commissions, including asthma, breast cancer, cervical cancer, diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2, epilepsy, hypertensive heart disease, intracerebral hemorrhage, ischemic heart disease, ischemic stroke, major depressive disorder, motor vehicle road injuries, rheumatic heart disease, sickle cell disorders, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. The commissions prioritized an average of 35 health-sector interventions based on cost-effectiveness, financial risk protection, and equity-enhancing rankings. The prioritized interventions were estimated to cost an additional US$4.70-US$13.70 per capita or approximately 9.7%-35.6% of current total health expenditure (0.6%-4.0% of current gross domestic product). Semistructured surveys and qualitative interviews of commission representatives demonstrated positive outcomes in several thematic areas, including understanding NCDIs of poverty, informing national planning and implementation of NCDI health-sector interventions, and improving governance and coordination for NCDIs. Overall, national NCDI Poverty Commissions provided a platform for evidence-based, locally driven determination of priorities within NCDIs.

Cervical cancer screening outcomes in Zambia, 2010-19: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Globally, cervical cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death among women. Poor uptake of screening services contributes to the high mortality. We aimed to examine screening frequency, predictors of screening results, and patterns of sensitisation strategies by age group in a large, programmatic cohort. METHODS: We did a cohort study including 11 government health facilities in Lusaka, Zambia, in which we reviewed routine programmatic data collected through the Cervical Cancer Prevention Program in Zambia (CCPPZ). Participants who underwent cervical cancer screening in one of the participating study sites were considered for study inclusion if they had a screening result. Follow-up was accomplished per national guidelines. We did descriptive analyses and mixed-effects logistic regression for cervical cancer screening results allowing random effects at the individual and clinic level. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2010, and July 31, 2019, we included 183 165 women with 204 225 results for visual inspection with acetic acid and digital cervicography (VIAC) in the analysis. Of all those screened, 21 326 (10·4%) were VIAC-positive, of whom 16 244 (76·2%) received treatment. Of 204 225 screenings, 92 838 (45·5%) were in women who were HIV-negative, 76 607 (37·5%) were in women who were HIV-positive, and 34 780 (17·0%) had an unknown HIV status. Screening frequency increased 65·7% between 2010 and 2019 with most appointments being first-time screenings (n=158 940 [77·8%]). Women with HIV were more likely to test VIAC-positive than women who were HIV-negative (adjusted odds ratio 3·60, 95% CI 2·14-6·08). Younger women (≤29 years) with HIV had the highest predictive probability (18·6%, 95% CI 14·2-22·9) of screening positive. INTERPRETATION: CCPPZ has effectively increased women's engagement in screening since its inception in 2006. Customised sensitisation strategies relevant to different age groups could increase uptake and adherence to screening. The high proportion of screen positivity in women younger than 20 years with HIV requires further consideration. Our data are not able to discern if women with HIV have earlier disease onset or whether this difference reflects misclassification of disease in an age group with a higher sexually transmitted infection prevalence. These data inform scale-up efforts required to achieve WHO elimination targets. FUNDING: US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.

Achieving equity in cervical cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): Strengthening health systems using a systems thinking approach.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is leading a call to action to eliminate cervical cancer by the end of the century through global implementation of two effective evidence-based preventive interventions: HPV vaccination and cervical screening and management (CSM). Models estimate that without intervention, over the next 50 years 12.2 million new cases of cervical cancer will occur, nearly 60% of which are preventable only through CSM. Given that more than 80% of the cervical cancer occurs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), scaling up sustainable CSM programs in these countries is a top priority for achieving the global elimination goals. Multiple technologies have been developed and validated to meet this need. Now it is critical to identify strategies to implement these technologies into complex, adaptive health care delivery systems. As part of the coordinated cervical cancer elimination effort, we applied a systems thinking lens to reflect on our experiences with implementation of HPV-based CSM programs using the WHO health systems framework. While many common health system barriers were identified, the effectiveness of implementation strategies to address them was context dependent; often reflecting differences in stakeholder's belief in the quality of the evidence supporting a CSM algorithm, the appropriateness of the evidence and algorithm to context, and the 'implementability' of the algorithm under realistic assessments of resource availability and constraints. A structured planning process, with early and broad stakeholder engagement, will ensure that shared-decisions in CSM implementation are appropriately aligned with the culture, values, and resource realities of the setting.

Zambia cervical cancer control program resource mapping - Leveraging support to achieve the 90-70-90 elimination target.

BACKGROUND: Zambia has one of the highest incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer at 65.5 and 43.4 per 100 000 respectively. In line with efforts of the cervical cancer elimination strategy the Zambia national cervical cancer sub-committee undertook a resource mapping exercise of projected spending on the prevention and control program. The aim was to elicit the available resources over a prospective 4-year period and compare it to the projected costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 4-step approach was used for this activity. This included creation of tool adapted for the local program, orientation of stakeholders to the tool, population of the tool by stakeholders and collation, comparison and reporting of submitted data. Comparative analysis to the cervical cancer control costing report 2019-2023 was conducted. RESULTS: Fifty-nine percent of resources in the stipulated period were allocated to prevention efforts. Isolated with diagnostic, treatment and palliation (14 %) the prevention allocation increased to 81 %. Community and stakeholder engagement was 5 % whilst technical assistance and health information were 12 % and 9 % respectively. The dispensation to research was the lowest at 0.7 %. For health system levels, secondary and primary levels were projected at 40 % and 12 % respectively following the central allotment of 45 %. Community and stakeholder engagement took up 3 %. The secondary prevention to tertiary intervention ratio was 4:1 in the projection compared to approximately 2:1 in the actual budgeted costs for the same period, showing a two-fold discordance. CONCLUSION: To achieve the accelerated elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem policy cohesiveness is necessary. This can be facilitated with continuous stakeholder involvement in planning, implementation and review. POLICY SUMMARY: In order to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem policy cohesiveness is vital and this can be achieved by continuous stakeholder involvement in planning, implementation and review.

Minimizing Delays in the Breast Cancer Pathway by Integrating Breast Specialty Care Services at the Primary Health Care Level in Zambia.

PURPOSE: In Zambia, more than two-thirds of female patients with breast cancer present with late-stage disease, leading to high mortality rates. Most of the underlying causes are associated with delays in symptom recognition and diagnosis. By implementing breast care specialty services at the primary health care level, we hypothesized that some of the delays could be minimized. METHODS: In March 2018, we established a breast care specialty clinic for women with symptomatic disease within 1 of the 5 district hospitals in Lusaka. The clinic offers breast self-awareness education, clinical breast examination, breast ultrasound, ultrasound-guided breast biopsy, surgery, referral for chemoradiation, follow-up care, and electronic medical records. RESULTS: Between March 2018 and April 2019, of 1,790 symptomatic women who presented to the clinic, 176 (10%) had clinical and/or ultrasound indications for histologic evaluation. Biopsy specimens were obtained using ultrasound-guided core-needle procedures, all of which were performed on the same day as the initial visit. Of the 176 women who underwent biopsy, 112 (64%) had pathologic findings compatible with a primary breast cancer, and of these, 42 (37%) were early-stage (stage I/II) disease. Surgery for early-stage cancers was performed at the district hospital within 2 weeks of the time of definitive pathologic diagnosis. Patients with advanced disease were referred to the national cancer center for multimodality therapy, within a similar time frame. CONCLUSION: Breast care specialty services for symptomatic women were established in a district-level hospital in a resource-constrained setting in Africa. As a result, the following time intervals were minimized: initial presentation and performance of clinical diagnostics; receipt of a definitive pathologic diagnosis and initiation of surgery; receipt of a definitive pathologic diagnosis and referral.

Challenges, Opportunities, and Priorities for Advancing Breast Cancer Control in Zambia: A Consultative Meeting on Breast Cancer Control.

In 2016, the Zambian government made cancer control a national priority and released a National Cancer Control Strategic Plan for 2016 to 2021, which focuses on malignancies of the breast, cervix, and prostate, and retinoblastoma. The plan calls for a collective reduction in the cancer burden by 50%. In support of this vision, Susan G. Komen sponsored a consultative meeting in Lusaka, Zambia, in September 2017 to bring together the country's main breast cancer stakeholders and identify opportunities to improve breast cancer control. The recommendations generated during the discussions are presented. There was general agreement that the first step toward breast cancer mortality reduction should consist of implementation of early detection service platforms focused on women who are symptomatic. Participants also agreed that the management of all components of the national breast cancer control program should be integrated and led by the Ministry of Health. As much as possible, early detection and treatment services presently offered by the Cervical Cancer Prevention Program of Zambia and Cancer Diseases Hospital should be leveraged. Efforts are under way through multiple stakeholders to implement the following recommendations: development of national guidelines for the early diagnosis of breast cancer, training of breast surgeons, implementation of early detection and surgical treatment service platforms at the district-hospital level, and epidemiologic research, including the improvement of electronic recording mechanisms.